Posts
The bombs used in the Israeli strike that killed dozens of Palestinians in a camp for displaced people near Rafah on Sunday were manufactured in the United States, according to weapons experts and visual evidence reviewed by The New York Times.
Munition debris filmed at the strike location the next day revealed remnants of a GBU-39 bomb, designed and made in the U.S., according to The Times. U.S. officials have encouraged Israel to use more of these bombs, which they claim can reduce civilian casualties.
**Global Protests Erupt After Deadly Israeli Strike in Rafah**
A key detail identified in the weapon debris was the tail actuation system, which controls the fins guiding the GBU-39 to its target, according to Trevor Ball, a former U.S. Army explosive ordnance disposal technician who identified the weapon on X. The unique bolt pattern and the slot where the folding fins are stowed were clearly visible in the debris, Mr. Ball said.
The munition fragments filmed by Palestinian journalist Alam Sadeq were marked with a series of numbers beginning with “81873.” This identifier code is assigned by the U.S. government to Woodward, an aerospace manufacturer based in Colorado that supplies parts for bombs including the GBU-39.
At least 45 people in Kuwaiti Al-Salam Camp 1, built in early January, were killed by the blast and subsequent fires, according to the Gazan health ministry. More than 240 were wounded.
U.S. officials have been urging the Israeli military for months to increase the use of GBU-39 bombs in Gaza because they are generally more precise and better suited for urban environments than larger bombs, such as U.S.-made 2,000-pound bombs that Israel routinely uses. President Biden stated earlier this month that the U.S. was pausing the delivery of larger bombs.
“The strike was conducted using two munitions with small warheads suited for this targeted strike,” Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, the Israeli military spokesman, said during a news conference on Tuesday. The bombs contained 17 kilograms of explosive material, he said. “This is the smallest munition that our jets can use.”
In response to questions from The Times, the Israeli military declined to specify the munition used. The GBU-39 has a net explosive weight of about 17 kilograms, or 37 pounds.
Admiral Hagari said the military had taken steps to narrowly target two Hamas leaders, who he said were killed in the strike, and did not expect the munitions to harm nearby civilians. The bombs were dropped on sheds inside a camp for internally displaced people, with many tents visible nearby. Footage shows that the bombing set off deadly fires.
Admiral Hagari said the Israeli military’s investigation was continuing. He suggested the fire might have been sparked by a secondary explosion, indicating there may have been weapons stored in the area.
“Our munition alone could not have ignited a fire of this size,” Admiral Hagari said.
Frederic Gras, a French consultant on munitions, questioned the Israeli military’s reasoning. “Any explosion or detonation starts a fire as soon as flammable products are in the vicinity,” he said, noting that there are often many gas cylinders and lamps in such camps.
Video shot by witnesses after the attack shows the scale of suffering. People scream as they pull charred bodies from rubble while flames rage behind them. One man holds up the body of a headless child.
“The Israelis have said they used 37-pound bombs,” White House spokesman John Kirby said at a briefing on Tuesday. “If it is in fact what they used, it is certainly indicative of an effort to be discreet and targeted and precise.”
Larry Lewis, a former Pentagon and State Department adviser who has written several federal reports on civilian harm, said it seemed as though the Israeli military had in this case taken steps to mitigate danger to civilians.
“Secondary explosions can be hard to anticipate,” Mr. Lewis said.
However, he was troubled that in surveillance footage released by the military, four people appeared to be outside the targeted buildings before the strike. Mr. Lewis said the decision to strike at that time raises questions about whether the Israeli military “knew and accepted a possible civilian toll” or failed to notice the people, suggesting potential problems in their precautionary measures.
Wes J. Bryant, a retired American Air Force master sergeant who served on a task force critical of Israel’s use of weapons in Gaza, told The Times that he had dropped many GBU-39 bombs during his military service and that this strike was problematic.
“It indicates continued targeting negligence — either an unwillingness or inability to effectively safeguard civilians,” Mr. Bryant said. “When you use a weapon that’s intended as precision and low collateral damage in an area where civilians are saturated, it really negates that intended use.”
Ctrl+M
No comments:
Post a Comment